11/9/2023 0 Comments End of life choices californiaThe role of doctors in enabling patient autonomy is evident in abortion, which, without medical assistance, may result in unnecessary harm. Table 2: Arguments for and against legalising euthanasia. Relevant moral and philosophical considerations are beyond the scope of this paper. Table 2 summarises some of the more common arguments for and against euthanasia. 4 Also absent are legal requirements for nurses, pharmacists or other health professionals who may conscientiously object overseas evidence notably indicates nurses are often approached first with enquiries about euthanasia. The EoLCA is silent on objection for organisations, eg, hospices, though there has been a recent High Court case which granted limited declarations around interpretation of the Act. Objectors are not required to make onward referrals. The Act requires medical objectors to inform patients of their objection and advise they can seek a replacement from the Support and Consultation for End of Life in New Zealand (SCENZ) Group, to be established by the Ministry of Health. O the doctor to reconfirm competence when patients affirm the decision to proceed at the chosen time for administration of the lethal substance Conscientious objectionĬonscientious objection is defined in the EoLCA as any objection to euthanasia on the grounds of conscience. O the individual to inform anyone of their decision O an independent witness at any stage of the process O a ‘cooling off’ period between request and implementation O prior access to appropriate medical or palliative care
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |